Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘History’

Building on a workshop organized by my colleague Adriejan van Veen and me in 2022, we have been working on an edited volume titled “Depoliticisation before Neoliberalism. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political in Modern Europe”. We were able to bring together a range of scholars from diverse national backgrounds and with different areas of expertise to study the phenomenon of depoliticisation in a long-term and european-wide perspective.

We are very happy that the volume has now been announced as part of the series Palgrave Studies in Political History.

The book’s announcement reads as follows:

This book analyses processes of depoliticisation in modern Europe from the emergence of a distinct ‘political’ sphere in the late eighteenth century until the present day. Drawing on case studies from across the continent, it demonstrates that depoliticisation has played an integral part in the contestation of modern politics since its inception. Developing a novel conceptual framework, the authors argue that depoliticisation is much more than a simple negation of politics. Rather than an anonymous and amorphous process, depoliticisation often presents an express, actor-driven effort, with modes and forms no less varied than the more familiar manifestations of politicisation. Consequently, the chapters encompass a whole range of depoliticising discursive strategies, performative practices, and institutional rearrangements, playing out across different regime types, from revolutionary orders and representative governments with limited franchises to mass democracies and totalitarian dictatorships. Illustrating how historical actors understood ‘the political’ and in which ways they intervened to renegotiate its boundaries, this book seeks to enhance our understanding of modern politics and pose questions that still resonate today. At a time when the boundaries of the political are once more heavily contested, this book offers thought-provoking insights that will appeal to scholars of history, political science, and sociology, as well as to activists and political practitioners.

Behind the scenes, my co-editor and I are still busy working out the last stages of the publishing process and it will probably still take some time until we hold the actual book in our hands, but we are very content that we are now seeing some first ‘signs of life’ and want to express our heartfelt gratitude to our contributors.

Table of contents

  • Adriejan van Veen and Theo Jung: Depoliticisation in Modern European Politics: An Introduction
  • Ido de Haan: Historicising Depoliticisation: Dimensions of the Political and Its Alternatives

    Part I: Discursive Depoliticisation: Ideas, Concepts, and Rhetoric
  • Matthijs Lok: Depoliticisation after Revolution: Moderation, Science and the State in the Nineteenth Century
  • Tamar Kojman: Between Religion and Politics: Constructing an Apolitical Sphere after the 1848–1849 German Revolutions
  • Ruben Ros: Depoliticising Democracy: Technocratic Antipolitics in Dutch Interwar Political Culture (1917–1939)
  • Stefan Scholl: Depoliticising the Economy? Semantic Struggles about ‘Politics’ and ‘the Economy’ during the Weimar Republic and National Socialism

    Part II: Doing Depoliticisation: Practices and Performances
  • Adriejan van Veen: “The Silent Citizen Became a Hero!” State, Civil Society, and the Depoliticisation of Dutch Society in the Restoration Era
  • Oriol Luján: Not Only Apathy and Disinterest: Abstention and the Blank Vote as Modes of Repoliticisation in Nineteenth-Century Europe
  • Eva Visser: Planning the Technate: The Apolitical Politics of the 1930s’ Technocratic Movement in the United States and Europe
  • Zoé Kergomard: Depoliticisation in Danger of Repoliticisation? The Ambiguities of Gaullist Get-Out-the-Vote Campaigns in the Early French Fifth Republic (1958–1969)
  • Adéla Gjuričová: Antipolitics as a Political Tool of Czech Dissent: From Earlier Roots to Its Second Life after 1989

    Part III: Institutional Depoliticisation: Delegation and Neutralisation
  • Mart Rutjes: Access Denied: The Institutional Depoliticisation of Representative Government during the Dutch Revolution, 1780–1801
  • Jan-Markus Vömel: (Un)Political Islam? Contesting the Turkish State’s Depoliticisation of Islam
  • Wim de Jong: The Police and the Political: The Problem of Depoliticisation in Dutch Municipal Policing, 1945–2002
  • Anna Catharina Hofmann: An Administered Society? Economic Planning and (De)Politicisation in the Late Franco Dictatorship
  • Koen van Zon: Eliminating Pests, Eliminating Politics? The European Community’s Regulation of Pesticides, 1958–1991

Read Full Post »

Under the auspices of the Cemetery of the March Fallen in Berlin, I’ve been part of a collaborative effort to develop a didactic manual aimed at schools, focusing on the German Revolution of 1848/49.

The resulting brochure emphasizes the “ambivalences” present in the revolution when viewed through the lens of democratic history. It features introductory texts, historical sources, and didactic concepts tailored for classroom use. Divided into three thematic blocks, it explores the history of nationalism, gender relations, and Jewish emancipation alongside the challenges of antisemitism.

I’d like to extend my heartfelt thanks to all the contributors, with special recognition for the brochure’s editors: Susanne Kitschun, Johann Gerlieb, and Paul Schmitz.

For those interested in more information in German, please see here.
You can also download the brochure for free here.

Read Full Post »

The University’s magazine Campus Hallensis has published a short interview about the research project on nineteenth and twentieth century British and German diaries I’m currently working on together with Dr Pia Schmüser (Halle), Prof Dr Melani Schroeter and Clara Llyod (both Reading).

More information about the binational, interdisciplinary project titled Between Voice and Silence: Communicative Norms in Diaries, 1840-1990, which is funded by the Leverhulme Trust, can be found here.

The interview highlights the importance of diaries as sources for social history as well as the invaluable resource of the Tagebucharchiv Emmendingen. The text, which also addresses another project being developed in Halle’s History Department, can be found here.

Many thanks to Ines Godazgar for taking an interest.

Read Full Post »

In the coming year, a new DFG Research Training Group “Politics of the Enlightenment” will be established at the Interdisciplinary Center for European Enlightenment Studies (IZEA) at the University of Halle-Wittenberg. We are now seeking applications for the first ‘cohort’.

  • 8 PhD positions of 4 years (48 months) each
  • 1 postdoctoral position of 5 years (60 months)

The first cohort will start on April 1, 2025. Two further cohorts of 5 doctoral students each will be recruited in 2026 and 2027. A second funding phase of the Research Training Group of 4 years is planned from 2030.

The application deadline for the first round of applications is November 4, 2024.

Read Full Post »

A call for applications for a new 1-year postdoctoral fellowship program in the context of the Research Group “Aufklärung – Religion – Wissen” of the Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg has just been published. It’s deadline is August 18, 2024.

For more information on the project, titled “sites of futurity” (Zukunftsorte) and on the application process, see here.

Read Full Post »

For a volume on practices of silence edited by Karolin Wetjen, Philipp Müller, Richard Hölzl and Bettina Brockmeyer, I wrote a chapter on the emergence of the silent march as a mode of protest.

Der Schweigemarsch. Entstehung und Funktionsvielfalt einer Protestpraxis in Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten (ca. 1880–1925)

[The Silent March. Emergence and Functions of a Protest Practice in Europe and the United States (c. 1880–1925)]

The chapter shows how the silent march first became established in the protest repertoire at the turn of the twentieth century, when in the context of the emerging political mass market various groups experimented with new modes of public protest. It approaches its topic in three steps. Firstly, it asks to what extent the boom of the silent march around 1900 was linked to earlier events of silent protest or to other practices established during the 19th century. Secondly, taking the French case as an example, I sketch the diversity of the contexts in which this mode of protest was used at the turn of the 20th century. The third, longest section takes a closer look at three protest movements in which the silent march played a particularly prominent role (the labor movement, the women’s movement and the African-American civil rights movement). Finally, I draw some comparative conclusions about the functions of this mode of protest and their historical development.

Read Full Post »

The digital research guide I wrote in cooperation with my colleagues Sabine Mischner, Christina Schröer, Sonja Levsen and Friedmann Pestel in 2016 and which had been updated in 2018 has now been published in another updated third edition, which also includes new contributions by Andreas Eder and Moritz Sorg.

It is part of the Clio-Guide series of introductions to digital resources in the field of historical scholarship.

The guide – which surveys institutions, online platforms, and other digital resources for historical research such as source databases and online lexica – can be accessed here.

Read Full Post »

At the network’s third workshop held in Bonn in June, the new website of the research network “HistoNet 19. Network for Historical Research on the Long 19th Century” was officially launched.

HistoNet19 is dedicated to bringing together academics working on the history of the long ninteenth century. The network’s website aims to increase the public visibility of this vibrant research field, providing a space for the presentation of current research projects and new publications as well as a platform for debate. As such, it is directed both at historians and at a broader public interested in current developments in historical research on the nineteenth century.

Announcements and information (e.g. conference announcements, calls for papers, new publications) as well as contributions such as project presentations, conference reports, reviews, etc. are very welcome at any time and can be sent (in German or English) to the network’s editor, my colleague Kay Schmücking.

Read Full Post »

We have received notice that a new interdisciplinary Research Training Group, which I had applied for with a group of colleagues of the universities of Halle-Wittenberg, Leipzig and Erfurt, will be funded by the DFG (German Research Foundation). This means that from 2025 on, PhD students, visiting scholars and other researchers will be developing a wealth of new projects on the global “Politics of Enlightenment” since the eighteenth century.

Calls for application for PhD and Post-Doc positions will follow soon.

The Politics of Enlightenment

The Research Training Group (RTG) examines the politics of the Enlightenment from the 18th to the 21st century. Its approach is twofold: firstly, it analyzes the political claims and interpretations that have been fostered by the Enlightenment or in its name, and, secondly, the political discussions and measures which determines our understanding of Enlightenment that is constantly reinterpreted according to political interests and concepts. The project thus combines the study of the historical Enlightenment—here it relates in particular to recent research which has emphasized the complexity and diversity of Enlightenment movements— with the study of its impact, appropriation, and reinterpretation up to the present day.

Apparently, ‘Enlightenment’ is once again moving to the center of political debates on, for example, the crisis of the public sphere and the disappearance of truth. The historical expansion goes along with a spatial one, as the reassessment of the Enlightenment is no longer a European phenomenon but must be considered in a global context. This spatial widening is paid tribute to by the transnational conception of the RTG and by the inclusion of a postdoctoral position that focusses on issues of Enlightenment beyond Europe. Methodologically, these historically and geographically broad perspectives on the politics of the Enlightenment allow for the fruitful integration of different approaches such as the history of ideas and concepts, social and cultural history, political science and philosophy as well as literature and cultural studies, which is reflected in the team of applicants.

The joint work is oriented towards four thematic axes, which are both central to eighteenth century politics and to current references to Enlightenment: ‘civilization’; ‘public sphere’; ‘secularity’; ‘plurality’. The doctoral students will find a lively interdisciplinary working environment, that provides them with ideal conditions for completing their work. Thanks to its location at the Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of the European Enlightenment (IZEA) at Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU), the Research Training Group will be firmly anchored in Enlightenment research. In addition, the range of applicants’ institutional affiliations link the future doctoral students with two faculties at MLU, the Research Centre Gotha at the University of Erfurt as well as the Institute of Philosophy at the University of Leipzig.

Read Full Post »

Silence in Analogue and Digital Communication in Western Modernity. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Its Variety and Change.

Interdisciplinary Conference, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg

Halle, Germany, 12-14 December 2024

This conference seeks to explore how changes in the conditions, means, and opportunities of communication in the Western world since 1800 have affected the perception and the evaluation of silence and concealment. Silence is understood broadly as the absence of communication where it could have been expected or relevant, and as encompassing forms of concealment. Our object of investigation is therefore not limited to synchronous oral communication, but includes a multitude of written, oral, and multimodal forms of analogue and digital communication in a broad spectrum of historical and societal contexts.

The relevance of silence as a phenomenon of communication and the changes affecting uses, function and evaluation become manifest in Western modernity in at least five ways:

First, silence is part of an evolving communicative landscape in the constitution of modern societies as literacy increases and mass media develop along with different modalities of mediated communication, digitisation and social media. In this context, increasing production of, and exposure to, communication has led both to rising expectations on communication and to disappointment when expected communication fails to occur.

Second, processes of democratisation have increased the demand for information and transparency and for the inclusive and active participation of citizens in political processes and discourse since the long 19th century. As the volume of public discourse grew and expectations of and demands on communication rose, silence came increasingly to be scandalised. Moreover, refusal to engage in communication and discourse can be criticised as forsaking one’s right of political participation. Even modern dictatorships have to acknowledge expectations of participation and develop processes of pseudo-consensual communication. In turn, refusal to engage can be seen as resistance.

Third, for people with diverse ethnic, ability, or gender backgrounds, the availability of forums for expression and resonance becomes crucial, as members of diverse groups work for inclusion and against silence in analogue and digital communication. However, the very same strategies are being used to increase the acceptance of anti-democratic, exclusionary agendas, alleging a left-liberal hegemony and accusing the mainstream media of stifling freedom of expression and restricting access to discourse for some segments of political opinion.

Fourth, together with increased opportunities of and demands on communication, hopes have risen that communication itself can help solve problems and alleviate conflict. Political dialogue and negotiations, conflict mediation and therapeutical talking cures are designed to avoid or overcome problems, while communicative reticence is seen as an obstacle to achieving this.

Fifth, since the second half of the 20th century especially, social and cultural liberalisation has brought the de-tabooisation of traumatic experience, mental health, bodily functions, gender and sexuality, illness and disability. It would be interesting to investigate how such changes are negotiated in debates about what can(not) be said and in attempts to (re)draw borders of possibility and acceptability.

Papers are invited addressing the themes sketched above (or potentially others) while looking into the uses, functions, perceptions, and evaluations of silence in analogue or digital communication with a view to historical change. Questions such as the following could be pursued:

  • What are the functions of silence in different situational, institutional, and media contexts? How do such functions change before the background of various broader processes of social change?
  • Which societal, political or other consequences arise from controversial debates about the meaning and legitimacy of silence?
  • Which cultural values are associated with silence (and with communication as its implicit counterpart) in analogue and digital communication, and with what implications?
  • In which contexts and at what times do expectations of and demands on communication raise and fall? What consequences does this have for the ways in which silence is evaluated?
  • How do opportunities of communication and silence relate to societal diversity and  inclusion and/or marginalization?

Conference languages will be German and English. Papers will last 20 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of discussion. Please submit an anonymised abstract of up to 500 words (excluding references) via email to silenceinhalle@mail.de by 30 June 2024. You will hear back from the organising committee by the end of July 2024. We are planning to publish selected contributions after the conference.

There will be no charge for registration. Support for travel and/or accommodation expenses may be available for early-career researchers without financial backup from an institution. If this applies to you, please contact us at silenceinhalle@mail.de.

Organising committee: Annamária Fábián (Bayreuth, Germany), Theo Jung (Halle, Germany), Torsten Leuschner (Ghent, Belgium), Armin Owzar (Paris, France), Melani Schroeter (Reading, UK), Igor Trost (Passau, Germany), Stefanie Ullmann (Cambridge, UK), Judith Visser (Bochum, Germany).

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »